Did Neil Armstrong land on moon?? (everyone must see)

yugandhar357 · #1 04-16-2009, 07:03 AM

DID NEIL ARMSTRONG LAND ON MOON?? THE PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE

Issue 1: Since the Moon has only one light source, the Sun, the shadows must be in line. But in this cases, it looks as if there are multiple light sources in moon, which is not possible.

Issue 2: The foreground of many images of the astronauts on the Moon are filled in with light, while the shadows remain absolutely black, again proving that there are multiple light sources.

Issue 3: There are no stars in the background from pictures taken on the Moon.

Issue 4: In some images, a huge light source can be seen reflected in the astronaut's visors. This has to be a very bright, nearby source. There is no possibility of external light source in moon.

ISSUE 5 - How could NASA take TV images of the LM ascending on Apollo 15, 16, and 17 if there was no one on the Lunar surface to man the camera?

ISSUE 6: There can't be any pictures taken on the Moon because the film would melt in the 250° temperatures. Any film exposed to 250° would indeed melt at that temperature.

Issue-7: The LM engine was very powerful. How come it did not leave a crater below the spacecraft? Why didn't it kick up any dust when it landed?

Issue 8: The footprints left by the astronauts are proof that the Moon landings are fake.
This one is also essentially a two pronged argument. First, the Fox show charged that the LM engine was so powerful that the upper layer of dust should have been blown away around the LM, so there should not be any footprints. Others have charged that the footprints should not be there since in the absence of water as a bonding agent, they should not maintain coherent shapes and sharp outlines.

Issue 9: There is no dust on LM footpads. -- According to Kaysing and Fox, this is the strongest evidence that the Moon landings are faked. They allege that with the swirling dust from LM descent engine, the foot pads should be covered with dust.

Issue 10: The pictures below show that flags are waving. And they never will. The flag was on the airless Moon, just as we all knew.

THERE ARE MANY MORE ISSUES ON THIS, BUT THOSE ARE TOO TECHNICAL FOR US.
NEIL ARMSTRONG WAS NOT THE FIRST PERSON TO LAND ON MOON

Subbu · 04-16-2009, 07:06 AM #2

wow.........inta story unda landing venuka

yugandhar357 · 04-16-2009, 07:12 AM #3

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subbu

wow.........inta story unda landing venuka

avunu subbu manam chinnapatinunchi anukunnadi fake

downloadsrk · 04-16-2009, 10:48 AM #4

the last one we can belive, if there is no air on moon, how would the flag is waving. good point. me to support u that it would be fake

downloadsrk · 04-16-2009, 10:49 AM #5

if they says that air is there, and the flag is waving due to air, then the foot print should not stay that much long time, so that the photo of foot print comes.

justfunny143 · 04-16-2009, 11:12 AM #6

yes it is fake

MastiStar · 04-16-2009, 11:15 AM #7

This show the fact that we believe anything the media tells us!

azharmukadam · 04-16-2009, 12:30 PM #8

good post dude.

hemanth_k · 04-16-2009, 12:56 PM #9

ya that landing is all fake dude... one of the nasa employee wrote a book posing about 100 doubts on dis landing of which only 10 are cleared...

reddy433 · 04-16-2009, 01:04 PM #10

discovery channel lo mythbusters ane program vostadi....adi chudandi....it clearly unravels all the mystery behind this and they say its not fake.....

indeed usa conquered the moon brothers

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Did Neil Armstrong land on moon??	teddy_hkp	Chai Time	2	12-30-2009 07:37 AM
Neil Nitin Mukesh’s Car Mania	Bot	Movie Chat and News	0	09-19-2009 02:00 PM
Anna Hansen Photo and wallpapers - Wife of Lance Armstrong	Bot	Movie Chat and News	0	06-05-2009 09:00 PM
Nude Neil in Jail!	Clueless	Movie Chat and News	0	04-19-2009 04:51 AM
Did We Land On The Moon?	Lazy Bones	English DVD VCD Movies	2	02-02-2008 04:12 PM